The link below outlines the Australian Human Rights Commission comments about Australia’s counter-terrorism laws.
This is useful for how Australia UNDERMINES democratic principles (you can find similar USA measures that would help for the ‘one other country’ part). It is also useful for BILL OF RIGHTS, and for how ONE INDIVIDUAL was treated in the Australian PAL system – all 3B topics.
Particularly useful is the outline of the case studies of 4.1 Haneef (Australia), 7.2 Hicks (USA), plus some general comments about the need FOR a Charter of Rights 8.1 and general recommendations (8.2 and 8.3).
This is useful for how Australia UNDERMINES democratic principles (you can find similar USA measures that would help for the ‘one other country’ part). It is also useful for BILL OF RIGHTS, and for how ONE INDIVIDUAL was treated in the Australian PAL system – all 3B topics.
Particularly useful is the outline of the case studies of 4.1 Haneef (Australia), 7.2 Hicks (USA), plus some general comments about the need FOR a Charter of Rights 8.1 and general recommendations (8.2 and 8.3).
http://www.humanrights.gov.au/human-rights-guide-australias-counter-terrorism-laws
LINK TO NOTES OF TALK ABOUT HIGH COURT AND REFUGEES
http://www.lawsocietywa.asn.au/Sir-Ronald-Wilson-Lecture
http://www.lawsocietywa.asn.au/visageimages/multimedia/Education-resources/2013%20SRWL%20Paper%20LSWA%20Generic%20Template%20Final.pdf